FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#1
Has anyone every given their therapist an ultimatum? My T and I don’t really talk about child parts, but from what I’ve read, I am keenly aware that I’m behaving like demanding and bratty child. Please humor me though. I went to therapy on Wednesday and that unleashed all sorts of emotions that I’d like to just touch base with my T about, but about a month ago he said he would no longer respond to my emails. So he stirred the pot, then left me on my own to deal with all sorts of emotions that arose during our session. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to request a quick email to help me figure this out or to at least hold me over till our next session. I feel like telling him that if he doesn’t reply to my email then I won’t come to our session next week. Huge, bratty acting out, I know. But I’m mad and it feels good to think about at least.
|
Reply With Quote |
growlycat, LabRat27, seeker33, SlumberKitty
|
Poohbah
Member Since Oct 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,073
5 70 hugs
given |
#2
Well, if you provide an ultimatum, you need to be prepared for the consequences. Your T will likely tell you he'll see you in two weeks then. Giving in to your ultimatum would be rewarding bad behaviour.
Is there another way to frame this? Can you send your T an email, explain that you are aware he doesn't reply to emails outside of session, but you felt this was important enough that it warranted sending. Tell him you are willing to pay him for his time should he be willing to reply, and that you appreciate him taking the time to read it, either way. Why not try working with him, instead of against him? It's ok to be mad at him - we all get mad at our Ts from time to time, but why not work through that anger with skills instead of pettiness? |
Reply With Quote |
LabRat27, MRT6211
|
Magnate
Member Since Jul 2011
Posts: 2,071
12 128 hugs
given |
#3
No, I didn't because I knew it wouldn't scare them.
If you are not prepared to follow through on your threat, then it wouldn't help you. It wouldn't even give you a temporary satisfaction of feeling powerful because your T would be unfazed by it. It's not a big deal for him to lose you. He won't be terribly upset. But it is a big deal for you to lose him. So, if you make an empty threat, it'd make you feel even more powerless in the end. You have to make a decision about staying or leaving. If you think the negatives of your therapy outweigh the positives, just leave without saying anything. Otherwise, just stay and accept what you have now, because it doesn't look like your T is someone who welcomes egalitarian discussions and negotiations on how to design the process. He makes all decisions by himself and he gives you little room to wiggle. With this rigid approach, your only choice is to accept it or to get the hell out of there. I'd choose the latter, but that's me. |
Reply With Quote |
lucozader
|
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#4
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
LabRat27
|
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#5
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Member
Member Since Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 223
6 1 hugs
given |
#6
I told my therapist I needed a hug or we needed to end. He wouldn't hug me so I left therapy.
That said, I knew there was a 99% chance he wouldn't agree to the hug before I gave him the ultimatum. If you're giving ultimatums, you need to know you can follow through with them, and that what you're asking for is critical. They're really a last ditch chance to save a relationship, and I think you need to go in knowing it's unlikely to work. If you give in after giving an ultimatum, you'll feel awful and smaller. One of the previous posters mentioned that therapists generally care less about the relationship than you do, and I think that's true. But I don't think the fear of losing someone who is not working for you is a reason to stay. I'm sad my therapy ended the way it did, but I don't regret leaving, because it wasn't working for me any more. So I think you need to look at the big picture here - - if this is a momentary thing, talk to him. If the relationship isn't functioning for you, think carefully about what you want to do, and only issue an ultimatum if you're ready for the (likely) emotional fallout. |
Reply With Quote |
LonesomeTonight
|
Poohbah
Member Since Sep 2016
Location: Europa
Posts: 1,169
7 112 hugs
given |
#7
I don't know if it's really ultimatum but we have had these discussions where I've said that I'm not sure there's point to continue treatment with him because he is not X or is not doing Y. Those X and Y things have always been very subtle though, not concrete things like responding to emails.
My T has never steadily responded to emails but he also declared at one point that he would not respond at all and some time later that he even would not read my emails anymore, these events initiated many heated discussions and accusations but not the ultimatums per se. Having feelings stirred up during the session and left to deal with them on your own is very difficult. Have you been able to talk about it in session? Have you asked him what he suggests you could do in such a situation? In my opinion, one thing that could help would be more frequent sessions. Another thing that could help are short phone calls. Not every T can accommodate that but that was something I negotiated with my T for a period where I felt that I'm just not able to get through the day. Sure, he took this option away when he figured that I don't really need it anymore and then I was angry too but in fact I truly did not need it then anymore and that was ok. Regarding such T's behaviour as rigid I'm convinced those who see it like this just lack the wider context to adequately evaluate things. This is the same as me evaluating other children mothers in childhood. Because I had absolutely no idea what function or meaning a mother has to a child and I could only generalise from my own very biased experiences I assessed them based on beauty. I could not understand how some children could tolerate or even seem to like their not so beautiful (or even worse, fat) mothers. I just couldn't understand it back then. |
Reply With Quote |
unaluna
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#8
You say a quick email.
It wouldn't be quick. And the response might lead to more confusion. I'm fortunate that T replys to my emails. In the beginning though, I'd become angry at her response and nothing she could say was right. Because she knows what she's doing she didn't abandon me but carried on emailing until i worked out what was really going on. Nowadays its just a quick back and forth. T use to say that tone cannot be picked up through email nor can she keep me safe through email. But she saw how important that connection was needed in my case. So. Just be aware. This really isn't just about email. The email represents something (m)other to you. If a T feels they can't convey tone nor feel they you are safe if email goes wrong then I can see why they won't engage in it. Plus being left alone isn't quite right. With time we carry the therapeutic experience within us. They're are times we feel very alone. But the knowing that we will eventually be back in session and at the very least able to protest this. |
Reply With Quote |
Lrad123, unaluna
|
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#9
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#10
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Magnate
Member Since Oct 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,787
5 7 hugs
given |
#11
I never emailed with my therapists; it just wasn't something they offered and I didn't know it was a "thing," a possibility, so it was a non-issue. If I needed to communicate something to my therapist between sessions, I had to pick up the phone and speak to them directly.
I'm actually glad that phone conversation was really ever my only option. I knew if I picked up that phone, I had to have an actual conversation, so I took the time to think it through before I did so. For me, I think if email had been an option, it would have been too tempting to use it like a "drive by;" shoot off my mouth and run, knowing the consequences weren't immediate. And then I would have been stewing about what they thought or would they respond. Sounds too anxiety-laden for me. I've had people do that via email to me (the joys of being a teacher), so I know how truly ineffective email is in dealing with highly charged emotional situations. Nothing really gets discussed, one person is misunderstanding the words of the other or simply using the impersonal method of communication to emotionally vent in a way that cuts of actual dialogue because they aren't really wanting to hear anything but their own voice. Things get built up in their heads in the meantime, waiting for a response that they often misinterpret anyway, and the situation escalates rather than resolving. I've learned to just pick up the phone and call; it de-escalates so many situations to just have a conversation, even just a few minutes, where both parties and talk, ask questions, clarify, and come to some sort of plan. What would happen if you, instead of emailing, actually picked up the phone to call your therapist and spoke to him for a few minutes about the need to talk about your reaction to this change next time you have a session? How different would it be to actually express that need and allow him to dialogue with you for a few minutes so that you can both clarify your communication in real time? Maybe two minutes on the phone would actually be more calming and communicative than throwing out an email and being left to stew about the unfairness of the limitations of emails. Something to think about maybe? |
Reply With Quote |
piggy momma, Taylor27
|
Legendary Wise Elder
Member Since Jul 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 27,329
(SuperPoster!)
5 117.7k hugs
given |
#12
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#13
I realize the ultimatum is a no-win situation. I’d feel frustrated with no response, but I might think he was weak if he did respond because he said he wasn’t going to. I sometimes feel like I’m trying to mess things up in therapy which is a new experience for me because that’s not generally how I operate in my real life.
|
Reply With Quote |
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#14
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Poohbah
Member Since Nov 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 1,332
6 372 hugs
given |
#15
So very true. I’m trying to figure it all out. Hoping I don’t alienate my T in the process. So far he’s sticking with my craziness which I am thankful for and a bit embarrassed about.
|
Reply With Quote |
chihirochild, LonesomeTonight
|
Magnate
Member Since Aug 2011
Posts: 2,082
12 78 hugs
given |
#16
Quote:
Acting out is one thing; entertaining doing something bratty is an entirely different matter. My old T once said that even the best person in the world has had thoughts about perpetrating really awful deeds, but the difference is that only sociopaths routinely carry them out. Just because you "feel like telling him" that you have an ultimatum doesn't mean that you're going to deliver that ultimatum. Do you feel better having posted here? |
|
Reply With Quote |
skeksi
|
Comfy Sedation
Member Since Sep 2012
Location: the woods
Posts: 19,301
(SuperPoster!)
11 8,149 hugs
given |
#17
I don't think most people respond well to ultimatums... unless it's like a toddler or something
__________________ |
Reply With Quote |
Grand Magnate
Member Since Aug 2012
Location: Anonymous
Posts: 3,132
11 129 hugs
given |
#18
Quote:
I'm not surprised that you want to use email to deal with your emotions. It is not unreasonable to ask your T to respond but he's already said he won't. So that is unreasonable, in my opinion, to not take no for an answer. Learning to sit with emotions is a grown up job, and one thing that might help you is to use part of your session to talk about how you're going to deal with the stirred up pot for the next week. I don't think the ultimatum is the issue nor is whether you are being bratty or whatever. It seems pretty toned down for what you're describing, the label doesn't seem to match the reality. To me "huge bratty acting out" would be setting his office door on fire or something. As far as I've experienced, things being stirred up and going to the next session with the intention of processing them is just the way therapy has gone for me. When sessions were particularly intense, my T would offer a "containment" strategy at the end that worked really well for me. So it's possible that leaving a session doesn't have to be leaving you "alone," but your T has made it very clear he's not going to respond to your emails no matter the circumstances. Given that you're making progress, I'd be inclined to stick with it to see how far you can go next session, but you can skip with or without an ultimatum or quit or whatever seems best to you. |
|
Reply With Quote |
Lrad123
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
#19
I think that ultimatums can sometimes work well if they aim to address something the other party is not doing responsibly, not sticking to their promises or prior agreements in a situation where there is mutual interest. I would not use ultimatums before exhausting most other forms of communication and before assessing my own part in it and whether I do participate sufficiently and my expectations are realistic.
I really doubt that a client can truly push a T to do what they don't want though, especially outside of session. Are you talking with him about your ongoing frustrations around emaling? Maybe that's how the experience could be most useful? You have definitely been through a lot regarding this email topic, including a period when you said stopping the emailing empowered you. It does seem like an ongoing struggle. I personally don't see demanding that he email realistic with a therapist unless they state explicitly that a certain amount/form/whatever of emailing is included in the service you pay for. I think acting out is fine but expecting the T to react according to those wishes that go beyond what is formally offered is quite unlikely to achieve anything but further frustration. As far as I understand, people who use therapy to work with similar interpersonal expectations do so by discussing it with the T. I don't think it is bad to act out occasionally though, that is what provides the material to work with I believe. I relate to the above. I communicated with my first therapist in ways I never do anywhere else unless I am in a similar very frustrating situation where I don't see a solution and people are manipulating me. It's always similar kinds of situations/people that can bring that out of me but it takes a lot. I always find it very insightful to honestly think about what these types of reactions represent and why the strong feelings. I think the standard explanation that it comes from some childhood lacks or mistreatments is only one possibility - one that Ts and therapy models often propose, but I think it can be many more and I would encourage everyone to think outside of the box if the typical explanations don't feel right, both just ourselves and when talking with a T. In this case, for example, why this emailing thing has been such an ongoing frustration for you. |
Reply With Quote |
Lrad123
|
Grand Magnate
Member Since Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,355
5 1 hugs
given |
#20
Yes I have given the therapist an ultimatum through text. I was mad because she kept talking about abuse and stuff. So I texted her and demanded she admit I was never abused or I would never come back. She texted me back and asked me if I would please come to the next session so we could talk about it. I went. She didn't say I wasn't abused, but she changed the you were abused blah blah to you believe you were not abused. I knew she was trying to be sneaky, but I accepted the compromise.
|
Reply With Quote |
LonesomeTonight
|
Reply |
|